| ||
November 10, 2005
![]()
You are on the invidual archive page of China terror alert. Click Simon World weblog for the main page.
![]() |
China terror alert
Could Muslim extremists be this stupid? Or is it security paranoia ahead of George W. Bush's visit to China? Could elements from Xinjaing be involved? From the American Embassy in Beijing: The Embassy has learned that Chinese police advised hotels that Islamic extremist elements could be planning to attack four and five star hotels in China sometime over the course of the next week. Chinese authorities have assured the Embassy that they are taking appropriate security measures and investigating the possible threat thoroughly. American citizens visiting Chinese four and five star hotels should review their plans carefully, remain vigilant with regard to their personal security, and exercise caution. Reports should be made to local police if one notices unusual activities in or around these areas.The SCMP repeats the alert, rings a few people and finds most have no idea what's going on: The warning did not say if the extremists were from within the mainland or abroad...A police spokesman in Beijing told TVB news last night it was not aware of the threat. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it had not received any notification from police and was trying to understand more about the situation.Is it likely? Who knows. If extremists really want to drag China further into the war on terror by embarrassing them when hosting President Bush, it would be a monumental tactical and strategic blunder. But since when has logic and strategy been terrorists' strong suit? The problem with these terror alerts are the danger of the "boy who cried wolf" syndrome. While it is prudent to err on the side of caution, surely there is a balance to be struck between the issuance of these alerts and saving them for when there is a genuine threat. What does it mean to review their plans carefully, remain vigilant with regard to their personal security, and exercise caution? Does the embassy assume that at other times people don't do these things? OK, I've reviewed my plan carefully, now what? Ah, but if it's viewed as an act of backside-covering, that's a different matter. In that case governments and embassies have a bias to over-issuing alerts. Sometimes alerts are justified: Australian Prime Minister John Howard's alerts came just before police smashed a major pontetial terror event. But in and of themselves, these alerts matter little. They offer little constructive advice and are typically too broad and vague. In the post September 11 world, everyone is more vigilant as they get on with their lives. Crying wolf doesn't help. Other reading Will has more on the terror warning in Beijing and there's the terror warning in Shanghai, although the British don't seem to know anything about it. Update (16:40) In what can only be described as a massive "up yours" to the Americans from the Chinese, Shaky sends this: The Chinese Ministry of Public Security informed the U.S. Embassy in Beijing on November 10 that Chinese security authorities have determined that the source of a reported threat against four and five star hotels in China is not credible. The United States Government is not aware of any other information of any threat against hotels in China, including Hong Kong. Our warden message(s) of November 9 and 10 on threats to hotels is therefore retracted.How embarrassing. Who was saying something about wolf? posted by Simon on 11.10.05 at 04:02 PM in the China law category. ![]() ![]()
Trackbacks:
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/127054 Send a manual trackback ping to this post. ![]()
Comments:
I agree that crying wolf is a problem. But today's bombing in Jordan - of foreign hotels! - is going to put the Gonganju on pins and needles... posted by: Sam Crane on 11.10.05 at 11:46 AM [permalink]I feel like I'm back home again. Are we at yellow or purple today? Who needs to blow a building up, just let in some chickens. posted by: austin on 11.10.05 at 12:02 PM [permalink]it could be misreading the code. Maybe they take a wrong turn on the Silk Road? posted by: Simon on 11.10.05 at 02:49 PM [permalink]Retracted apparently. I just got: The Chinese Ministry of Public Security informed the U.S. Embassy in Beijing on November 10 that Chinese security authorities have determined that the source of a reported threat against four and five star hotels in China is not credible. The United States Government is not aware of any other information of any threat against hotels in China, including Hong Kong. Our warden message(s) of November 9 and 10 on threats to hotels is therefore retracted. posted by: shaky on 11.10.05 at 04:19 PM [permalink]Updated again today... From: Shanghai, ACS [mailto:ShanghaiACS@state.gov]
American citizens in south China are advised to be aware of their U.S. citizens planning to travel to China should consult the Department American Citizen Services Unit This message is unclassified based on the provisions of E.O. 12958. ![]() |
![]()
|