October 20, 2004
Thanks but no thanks
China rejects Dalai Lama's statement The Chinese Foreign Ministry accused him of being insincere, saying ‘‘We believe the Dalai Lama should genuinely abandon his position of advocating Tibet independence and make public statement acknowledging that Tibet and Taiwan are inseparable parts of China. He should also stop all his splittist activities abroad. Only this way, we can make further contact or initiate discussion with him."
While I understand the domestic pressures in Chinese politics that make such statements necessary, if China continues to insist on such dogmatic statements both over Tibet and in the Taiwan dispute, then neither will be solved any time soon. Should China start showing some degree of flexibility, as is the norm in diplomacy, there are great gains to be had. In the past week both Taiwan and Tibet are reaching for dialogue with China. China's refusals to engage are to its own detriment.posted by Simon on 10.20.04 at 10:09 AM in the
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Send a manual trackback ping to this post.
China: My way, my way, MY WAY!
Excerpt: Simon has written up on China's recent decline of Taiwanese and Tibetan overtures to dialog. "While I understand the domestic pressures in Chinese politics that make such statements necessary, if...
Weblog: Rajan Rishyakaran
Tracked: October 20, 2004 03:45 PM
China asks the Dalai Lama to try harder
Excerpt: China’s strategies in Tibet and Taiwan will be quite different because it holds territory in one, and does not in the other. It is much easier for China to play a slow and steady game in Tibet, relying on a combination of repression, modernisation, eco...
Weblog: The Acorn
Tracked: October 23, 2004 10:09 AM
Simon's E. Asia Briefing: 2004-10-27
Excerpt: The following is a digest of highlights from the past month's Asia by Blog series over at simonworld.mu.nu. The round-up has four key areas of focus: China, Taiwan & Hong Kong (Politics, Economy & lifestyle, History sport & culture, Information), Korea...
Weblog: Winds of Change.NET
Tracked: October 27, 2004 10:07 AM
Unfortunately in last 55 years there have been more "tanks" than "thanks" from Beijing...
Enzoposted by: 1972 on 10.20.04 at 11:41 PM [permalink]
The One China policy of the PRC and the Kuomintang are both indefensible.
Honestly, I think East Turkestan (Sinkiang) makes more sense as a totally separate entity, but that is likely to happen... never.
Btw, GREAT comments note.posted by: Josh Narins on 10.21.04 at 07:17 AM [permalink]