| ||
← "Money, not brains" |
Return to Main Page
| "Con-sulting" →
| TrackBack (0)
August 04, 2006
You are on the invidual archive page of Brought to you by Pfizer. Click Simon World weblog for the main page.
|
Brought to you by Pfizer
A hard Hong Kong man is hard to find. The article doesn't quite spell it out, but it's pretty clear: "you need Viagra, whether you know it or not". Who'd have thought a drug company would sponsor such a survey with such, um, commercially viable results? Isn't this kind of article Barclay Crawford's thing? posted by Simon on 08.04.06 at 02:10 PM in the Hong Kong people category.
Trackbacks:
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/179879 Send a manual trackback ping to this post.
Comments:
Napoleans once said "Nothing is impossible" and so is this. posted by: Jeremy on 08.04.06 at 07:17 PM [permalink]Eli Lilly is a big drug company that puts profits over patients. that is the quality of HK newspapers, utterly uncritical, taking propaganda as serious news iten. posted by: sun bin on 08.05.06 at 01:10 AM [permalink]Pfizer roll out the same cooked up figures every year in an effort to sell more Via@gra. Please don't encourage them. They even invented the term erectile dysfunction. Sounds more clinical than impotence. posted by: michael on 08.05.06 at 10:25 PM [permalink]As an employee of the HK newspaper that published that sad item, I'd say that Sun Bin is correct. The reporter and assigning editor on that story honestly had no clue as to Pfizer's motive or connection regarding that poll. It would only be a viable Barclay Crawford item if it involved working girls selling it to patrons of Fenwicks, his primary source of news. Which I think is probably a good idea from a market perspective because all that coke can be erectilically disfunctioning so you probably need v**** to get it working properly again. (Can I just point out that I put the stars in the v word because I got this: Your comment submission failed for the following reasons: Your comment could not be submitted due to questionable content: v**** Please correct the error in the form below, then press Post to post your comment.) posted by: Phil on 08.07.06 at 02:46 PM [permalink]Or in other words - don't write stories we cannot comment about :) posted by: Phil on 08.07.06 at 02:47 PM [permalink]"The real fault lies on the back bench, where they are too jaded, overworked and tired to even care." yes, that is the root of the problem in HK newspapers. there is simply no business scale for HK newspaper to afford good staff. 1) the readership in english newspaper is perhaps comparable to that of a medium size county in US. so the scale is 100th of that of LA Times, or NY Times. It's not just a matter of a model business scale and economics. It's also, at least at The Standard currently, the fact that the paper is entirely under the direction of generally unsophisticated people whose native language is not English and whose news judgement and values seem entirely based on Chinese language newspapers in Hong Kong. Interesting! http://uvgarden.blogspot.com posted by: Jessica Copeland on 08.11.06 at 11:31 PM [permalink] |
|