| ||
← "Progress?" |
Return to Main Page
| "Words that matter" →
November 15, 2004
![]()
You are on the invidual archive page of The hunt is on. Click Simon World weblog for the main page.
![]() |
The hunt is on
Hemlock is primus inter pares amongst Hong Kong's blogging community. His daily writings inevitably combine wit and charm in skewering the great and good of HK and his HK Blog Guide remains a great reference (although it's time for an update). But now the game is on. HKMacs started by pondering if this could be the work of more than one? John Swaine picks up the baton and delves into the topic in depth (both links via Shaky), drawing from the archives the few crumbs Hemlock has left as to his identity. Previously I noted an interview he gave to Slate, naming his price as a couple of pints of lager. I'd say John's analysis is interesting but Hemlock has in times past mentioned the IFC mall and its splendour as well as frequently mentioning the Pacific Coffee there, unless he picks up his cuppa while passing from his Mid-Levels flat at Perpetual Oppulence Mansions on the way to his office. The puzzle remains as to the true identity of the Big Boss as John rightly points out the similarities to both Canning Fok and Richard Li. Both seem to fit, and the Big Boss could easily be Mr. Fok and the seldom-mentioned son Richard Li. And that's where I draw a line under the inquiry. The beauty is that Hemlock chooses to remain anonymous, for good reason. There's no point trying to find out who he is, for that would simply end one of the best journals on the web today. Fact or fiction is besides the point. So let's just leave it at this: Hemlock is a great writer and a discovery worth making on his own terms. posted by Simon on 11.15.04 at 06:26 PM in the![]() ![]()
Trackbacks:
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/54677 Send a manual trackback ping to this post. Hemlock continued Excerpt: Simon weighs in on the great Hemlock debate and concludes thusly: And that’s where I draw a line under the inquiry. The beauty is that Hemlock chooses to remain anonymous, for good reason. There’s no point trying to find out... Weblog: What Comes To Pass Tracked: November 15, 2004 09:11 PM ![]()
Comments:
Yeah I'm going to have to agree with you. I conducted a little thought experiment: If there was an envelop in front of me with Hemlock's real identity inside - would I be willing to open and read it, if I knew that it would probably taint the whimsical nature of his persona? Ultimately I realized that I'd be quite unwilling to take a peek. Who'd want to know the real identity of Winky Ip if it meant never reading of her exploits again? Hemlock is the everyman of the upper middle class. He captures a perception of Hong Kong that is at once ruthlessly satirical and infinitely real. He makes Hong Kong instantly accessible even for an estranged expat like myself (albeit one who yearns to return to the fragrant harbour). His anonymity gives his words further poignancy as you realize, just strolling around central that he could be exiting Prince's Building as you go in, or bustling past the bakery on Lyndhurst Terrace as you're ordering a box of the best Daan Tat money can buy. It's like being in the middle of 17th Century London and knowing that you share it with Samuel Pepys yet have no means of finding the man who documents it so tirelessly and eloquently, who's writing is shaping your perception of the very city you stand in. There's a certain charm to that. One which I wouldn't extinguish for all the smug self-satisfaction in the world. Later John posted by: John Swaine on 11.15.04 at 09:01 PM [permalink]![]() |
![]()
|