October 01, 2004

You are on the invidual archive page of Turning their back, again. Click Simon World weblog for the main page.
Turning their back, again

Hong Kongers have great experience with Mother Britain turning its back on its erstwhile colonials. In the lead-up to 1997 and with overblown fears of hoardes of wealthy Hong Kongers fleeing to London and Liverpool, the UK came up with a wheeze to deny HKers British citizenship. Instead they offered ersatz passports called British National Overseas, which are passports without citizenship. It was a disgusting episode by the British and a funny way to say thank you to one of its more successful colonies.

And now they are doing it again. The Nepalese Ghurkas, considered good enough to join the British army and risk life and limb for the Queen, have until now been denied citizenship by the British. Tony Blair has given in to immense pressure and now allowed Ghurkas whom have served in the British armed forces the right to citizenship. With a catch. The law will apply only to those demobilised after July 1, 1997. Not co-incidently, this is the day that Hong Kong was handed back to China. To see why, we need to go over some history:

The Gurkhas have served in the British army since 1815 when they impressed officers with their valiant defence against British invasion.

The brigade was transferred to Hong Kong from Malaysia in the 1970s to help quell Chinese-communist fomented political unrest. Some 7,500 were stationed here in 1997, but ahead of the handover Britain trimmed to brigade's numbers by some 5,000, the rest being redeployed around the world.

About half those demobbed remained in the city, taking advantage of the Beijing-backed government's offer of right of abode.

A far more comprehensive history is here. At the time of the handover many had been demobilised. It is an exact repeat of the short-sightedness that clouded the Home Office's vision in the lead up to the handover with Hong Kongers. There will not be hoardes of Ghurkas suddenly upping sticks and moving to England. And even if they did, the UK should welcome them with open arms and say thank you for everything you did for us. Instead we have another example of British xenophobia masked as a "prudent" decision. It is disgusting and demeans the UK.

posted by Simon on 10.01.04 at 12:52 PM in the




Trackbacks:

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/48027


Send a manual trackback ping to this post.

Simon's E. Asia Briefing: 2004-10-27
Excerpt: The following is a digest of highlights from the past month's Asia by Blog series over at simonworld.mu.nu. The round-up has four key areas of focus: China, Taiwan & Hong Kong (Politics, Economy & lifestyle, History sport & culture, Information), Korea...
Weblog: Winds of Change.NET
Tracked: October 27, 2004 10:07 AM


Comments:

It is an appalling episode and something that makes me embarrassed to be British. You are spot on.

posted by: Phil on 10.01.04 at 02:50 PM [permalink]

Have to agree that the government has got it wrong on this one and the earlier decision not to grant HK people the right to British citizenship. Unfortunately immigration is such a sensitive subject in the UK that they always tend to be over-cautious.

On which subject, perhaps you can remind which country it was that denied access to a boatload of refugees and prevented anyone seeing what was happening.

posted by: Chris on 10.04.04 at 03:31 PM [permalink]

Which was also disgraceful behaviour by my country.

posted by: Simon on 10.04.04 at 04:19 PM [permalink]

My point being that politicians do this, not a country or a nationality.

posted by: Chris on 10.04.04 at 11:02 PM [permalink]




Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?










Disclaimer