September 08, 2004

You are on the invidual archive page of Blogwatch. Click Simon World weblog for the main page.
Blogwatch

Welcome to the one and only edition of Blogwatch at this site. Today we look at a Hong Kong blog by George Adams called NOT The South China Morning Post which bills itself as the online satirical blog newspaper for Hong Kong committed to press freedom.

This site is a re-incarnation; during its hiatus the world of blogging emerged, much to Mr. Adam's disgust. In December I gave the site a plug and thought it held promise based on the good work of the first version. How wrong I was. And I'm not the only one.

The entries are in reverse chronological order and there is repeated linkage to other sites, exactly like blogs. The posts themselves are repetitive and revolve around either crude Photoshopping, slagging the SCMP or slagging fellow bloggers. I welcome anyone who can tell me the difference between NTSCMP and blogs, except that most blogs avoid bright yellow backgrounds and have a modicum of design nous. The pathological hatred of blogs at the NTSCMP is because bloggers have surpassed them in both content and interest.

For a "satirical" site it posts an interesting challenge: finding anything that is satirical. Satire is irony, sarcasm, or caustic wit used to attack or expose folly, vice, or stupidity. Insults are not caustic wit. Whining that Spike magazine is making the same obvious jokes as you site is not satire. What's worse is the NTSCMP seems incapable of seeing it; like many self-proclaimed satirists it cannot see the self-parody it has become. It is happy to subject all and sundry to its purview while taking itself far too seriously.

The original had satire and wit (it can be viewed in part here); the new version is desperate grasping at former glory. Undeservingly condescending it has all of 150 readers a day to show for 8 years of effort. Protestations of "quality not quantity" won't wash either. If a site has been as good as it thinks for that long it's readership would be something more akin to Randall's - a favourite target of NTSCMP. Most ludicrous of all is the enmity with which the NTSCMP treats other blogs. When it re-emerged many bloggers welcomed the new NTSCMP and could have remained a constant source of support and readers. Instead he chose to attack the very people that would have otherwise served as his fans. That has left him with a solitary fan and a spot in cyber-obscurity. I am looking forward to the rumoured print edition. It will be fascinating to see how it fares against Spike and if it manages to stay around as long as its competitor...but I fear it won't.

If it's solipsism rather than sophism you're after, I heartily recommend the NTSCMP blog for your daily dose of supercilious and sanctimonious smart-arsey.

posted by Simon on 09.08.04 at 02:47 PM in the




Trackbacks:

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/44609


Send a manual trackback ping to this post.


Comments:

I haven't bothered to click over in ages but is "doctor" Adams really claiming that he's being plagerized by the tedious Spike. Jesus, that's sad. It's like complaining that Mr. Tung is stealing your political ideas.

posted by: Conrad on 09.08.04 at 03:59 PM [permalink]

Hey Simon, I like your new header image.

Taking a look, I see NTSCMP slams you almost as much as me. Funny, I never heard you'd pissed in his morning coffee.

Your assessment is right on the money, and as such, you'll probably get slagged by George in revenge. Let's see if he can conjure some real satire if he does.

posted by: BWG on 09.08.04 at 11:33 PM [permalink]

I find it curious that someone could have such a profound dislike for blogs. I mean, blogging seems like a rather innocuous hobby -- some people like to read 'em, others don't. I'm not going to bad mouth the NTSCMP -- I don't like to bad mouth anyone's website unless he or she badmouths me first -- but I just don't see how it represents a more productive investment of ones time and energy than, let's say, your blog, or Conrad's, or even mine for that matter (OK, perhaps more than mine). I mean, yeah, I guess we could spend less maintaining/updating our sites and more time feeding the hungry, nursing the sick, doing peacekeeping duty in Afghanistan, etc. Given that most of do what we do for fun, however, and to the best of my knowledge, Dr. Adams isn't paying for anyone's bandwidth other than his own, I don't see where he gets off telling other Internet users what they should or shouldn't be doing with their websites. Or, perhaps better put, given that he's perfectly free to bash whichever website and/or launch vicious personal attacks on whoever he likes, I don't see why anyone should care what Dr. Adams tells them to do/not do with their own sites.

posted by: The Marmot on 09.08.04 at 11:43 PM [permalink]

Marmot: you're right, but I just figured Adams could do with someone turning the spotlight on him for a brief period. It's the least we could do given his pathological obsession with blogs, particularly Randall's, Conrad's and mine.

posted by: Simon on 09.09.04 at 03:48 PM [permalink]

Looks like NTSCMP is really getting through to dumb Australian bankers too. Good old George!

posted by: ExpatDrome on 09.09.04 at 08:49 PM [permalink]

George, why do you insist on making dumb comments under stupid names when everyone knows it's you?

Twat.

posted by: Adma George, PhD on 09.10.04 at 10:05 PM [permalink]




Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?










Disclaimer